Friday, May
14, 2021, 8 pm at Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum
Presenting
Xiaopei Xu
徐小培, pianist
~ Program
~
J.S.Bach/Franz Liszt:
Fantasia and Fugue in G Minor, BWV 542
Schubert/Franz Liszt:
Three Lieder Transcriptions
Gretchen am Spinnrade
Der Müller und der Bach
Erlkönig
Florence Price/Chi Wei Lo:
Paraphrase on “Resignation”
George Gershwin/Earl Wild:
Two Virtuoso Etudes on Gershwin Songs
“Embraceable You”
“Fascinating Rhythm” ~ intermission
~
F. Schubert:
Piano Sonata No.20 In A Major, D. 959 I.
Allegro
II. Andantino
III. Scherzo: Allegro vivace - Trio: Un poco più lento
IV. Rondo: Allegretto
"Brilliant Clarity from Xiaopei Xu":
"Xiaopei Xu is one strong pianist. Friday night at
the Gardner Museum she took a chisel to a range of
pieces and delivered incised, everywhere lapidary
performances of Bach-Liszt, Schubert-Liszt,
Price-Lo, Gershwin-Wild, Schubert, and Waller. "
"The BU DMA student, commenced with an exemplary, as
in could-hardly-be-improved rendition of Liszt’s
transcription of Bach’s S.542 Fantasy and Fugue. I
swear: in all of my hours spent at Bach organ
recitals I have not heard better rhythmic strength,
voice clarity, and drive than this. … with Bach
playing like this, she placed a prominent marker."
"Florence Price’s powerful song "Resignation"("My
life is a pathway of sorrow …") received its own
highly imaginative embellishments, indeed a
paraphrase, by Xu’s colleague, the pianist and
improviser Chi Wei Lo. The beautiful result even
featured effective soft vocalizing by the pianist."
- David Moran of The Boston Musical Intelligencer
It felt very
special playing a live concert at the beautiful Isabella
Stewart Gardner Museum’s Calderwood Hall last night.
Even though the capacity was still limited to 64, I
truly enjoyed the intimate chemistry and the warmth from
everyone in the space. Thank you so much, Dr. Cathy
Chan, for having me! -Xiaopei@FB
Xiaopei Xu
徐小培, pianist "A sensitive pianist and talented artist." — Martha Argerich
Hailed by the Boston Music Intelligencer as “a spellbinding and
expressive pianist”, Xiaopei Xu has been featured as a soloist
on three continents, striving for creativity in her artistic
expression. She made her Boston Symphony Hall debut in 2018,
performing Chopin Piano Concerto No.1 in E Minor with Maestro
Keith Lockhart and the Boston Pops.
Xu has received international acclaim with top prizes at the New
York International Piano Competition, Oberlin International
Piano Competition, Tureck International Bach Competition, and
the Washington D.C. International Young Artist Competition. She
has also performed at festivals including Pianofest in the
Hamptons, PianoTexas, Banff Music Centre, Sarasota Music
Festival, Russia Young Artist Festival, and the Walnut Hill
Music Festival in Boston.
In addition to her musical endeavors, Xu integrates her love for
visual arts with music, creating multidisciplinary
collaborations as a way to enhance the artistic experience. A
painter herself, she has been commissioned for several
installations and collaborative projects. Xu created a combined
art and concert experience at the Germany Society of
Pennsylvania, as well as an exhibition of her artwork in “The
Seven Deadly Sins,” a themed concert at the New England
Conservatory. Collections of her drawings have been published by
the Clara Haskil Competition’s Jeune Critique.
Xu currently resides in Boston and is pursuing a Doctor of
Musical Arts degree at Boston University. She holds a Master’s
degree from Yale University and a Bachelor’s degree from the New
England Conservatory of Music. Her principal teachers include
Boaz Sharon, Hung-Kuan Chen, Meng-Chieh Liu, and Xun Pan. She
has also worked with influential musicians such as Claude Frank,
Richard Goode, Andrea Bonatta, Russell Sherman, and Paul
Badura-Skoda.
Johann Sebastian Bach/Franz Liszt: Fantasia and Fugue in G
Minor, BWV 542
“I thought this art had died, but I see that in you it still
lives,” exclaimed the great Dutch organ-ist Johann Adam Reincken
upon hearing Bach improvise for “almost half an hour” on the
cho-rale An Wasserflüssen Babylon in Hamburg in 1720.
This compliment would surely have made an impression on Bach,
who had held the Dutch organist in high regard since his younger
days—in fact, one of Bach’s earliest-known manuscripts, from
1700, is none other than Bach’s own copy of Reincken’s massive
chorale fantasia on An Wasserflüssen Babylon. While this
event in 1720 marked the first time both organists met, Bach had
actually traveled to Hamburg for a different reason—he came to
audition for the post of organist at St. Jakob’s church. During
his audition, Bach improvised a fugue on the Dutch folk tune “Ik
ben gegroet,” which later was written down and became the Fugue
in G minor of BWV 542. Many scholars believe that the folk tune
that formed the basis of the fugue was chosen as an homage to
Reincken, who was al-so present at the audition. Even if Bach
astonished everyone with his performance, he did not get the
job, due to factors that were beyond his control.
Often nicknamed “Great” to differentiate it from the “Little”
Fugue in G minor, Bach’s Fantasia and Fugue in G minor, BWV 542,
is a major work for the organ both in scope and in the facility
required of the performer. The Fantasia is dark and tragic, and
the writing is quasi-improvisatory, yet Bach is as disciplined
as ever in his construction and in adhering to the traditions of
the North German organ school. Between declamatory outbursts,
toccata-like passages are contrast-ed with more serene and
controlled fugato sections. The Fantasia ends with a Picardy
third, launching the listener into a lighthearted yet impressive
fugue featuring two countersubjects and a jubilant conclusion.
Needless to say, to hear Bach improvise this fugue at his
audition must have been a mind-blowing experience.
In Liszt’s hands, Bach’s work translates seamlessly from the
organ to the piano. Without the or-gan pedals at his disposal,
Liszt was forced to move some voices around. That being said,
his arrangement captures the essence of Bach’s work in what can
only be described as a splendid tour de force.
Franz Schubert/Franz Liszt: Lieder Transcriptions Gretchen am Spinnrade
Der Müller und der Bach
Erlkönig
Schubert devoted himself to the lied (song genre),
composing more than 600 of them during his short life of 31
years. These works for the voice and piano encompass a vast
emotional and dramatic scope and are in many ways great operas
in miniature form. Tonight, they are heard in the solo piano
version, as transcribed by Franz Liszt, another great dramatist,
who wrote most of his Schubert transcriptions when he was in
Schubert’s hometown of Vienna between 1838 and 1839.
Gretchen am Spinnrade (Gretchen at the Spinning Wheel),
written when Schubert was 17 and later published as his Opus 2,
was his very first setting of a poem from Goethe, a poet and
play-wright who captivated the composer’s mind. In this
particular song, Schubert sets the text from a scene in Goethe’s
tragic play Faust. The song depicts a young girl, Gretchen, at
her spinning wheel, distraught as she obsesses over Faust,
with whom she is madly in love. The spinning wheel is heard
throughout the work, a haunting and obsessive sixteenth-note
pattern, reflecting her turbulent thoughts. The left hand
imitates the sound of the foot treadle, or perhaps a pound-ing
heart. Gretchen sings over this accompaniment, full of yearning
for her lover, Faust, whom she has only met briefly on the
street. She is overwhelmed with emotion, yearning for Faust
again, in this monologue: “My peace is gone, my heart is heavy;
never, but never again, shall I find peace. Where I do not have
him, that is the grave, the whole world is bitter to me.” The
song climaxes as she sings, “And ah, his kiss!”
Der Müller und der Bach (The Miller and the Stream)
belongs to the song cycle Die schöne Müllerin (The Fair
Maid of the Mill), based on poems by Wilhelm Müller. It was
written when Schubert was bedridden and sick with syphilis at
the age of 26. He was not only suffering from the symptoms of
the disease: he had also lost his hair due to a mercury
treatment and was in fear of losing his reputation and
relationships with friends. (Explaining Schubert’s plight,
Graham Johnson writes that the modern equivalent of syphilis
would be HIV or AIDS.) The poem here portrays the conversation
between a distraught and heartbroken young man, the Miller, and
a kindly brook that tries to comfort him. The dialogue begins
with the Miller saying to the brook: “Where a true heart dies of
love, there lilies wither on every bed; then must the full moon
go behind the clouds so that men do not see her tears; then
angels cover their eyes, and sob and sing the soul to rest.” The
stream replies: “And when love escapes from pain, a little star,
a new one, shines in the heaven: then there spring up three
roses, half red and half white, that will nev-er wither again,
from the thorns, and the angels cut off their wings and every
morning go down to the earth.”
Erlkönig (Erlking), based on another poem by Goethe, was
published as Schubert’s Opus 1 alt-hough it was written after
Gretchen am Spinnrade. The poem tells the story of a young
boy who is riding on a horse late at night with his father. The
repeated octaves create an atmosphere of drama and terror
resounding in the pounding steps of the horse. The child is
terrified as he sees and hears the Erlking, a supernatural being
who tries to lure him with promises of games and rewards.
However, his father, who does not see the creature, reassures
him that it must be some-thing else he hears and that it is
nothing to worry about. In the end, the Erlking takes the child
by force, harming him as he cries to his father for help,
prompting the father to ride with great haste to their
destination. Upon their arrival, however, he realizes that the
child has died in his arms. There are four characters in the
piece: narrator, father, son, and the Erlking. This work has
been a great favorite ever since Schubert conceived it, and
Liszt performed it on many concert tours, including in Leipzig,
Prague, London, Berlin, and St. Petersburg.
Musicologist Alan Walker has interestingly noted that Liszt
always adamantly insisted that the poem be printed in the solo
piano version. In 1838, when Haslinger printed the poems apart
from the score, on the inside of the front cover, Liszt
immediately requested that the publication be reprinted with the
words under the notes, exactly as Schubert himself had written
in his orig-inal score.
George Gershwin/Earl Wild: Two Virtuoso Etudes
“Embraceable You”
“Fascinating Rhythm”
The only pianist to have ever played for six consecutive US
presidents, virtuoso Earl Wild (1915–2010) held a deep affinity
and passion for the music of George Gershwin. His love of
Gershwin’s music began at the age of 27, while he was touring
with Arturo Toscanini as the pia-nist for the NBC Symphony
Orchestra. He was invited by Toscanini to perform Gershwin’s
Rhapsody in Blue. After a resounding success, Wild went on
to become a champion of his music and wrote a number of
Gershwin-inspired works throughout his life, including
“Improvisations on Someone to Watch Over Me,” “Grand
Fantasy on Porgy and Bess,” and perhaps most fa-mously,
his “Seven Virtuoso Etudes.”
“Embraceable You” is the fourth work in the set of etudes. The
writing is prelude-like, with its flowing, seemingly
extemporaneous arabesques and the melody floating in the treble
register. Harmonic inflections within the arpeggios create a
kaleidoscope of colors. After a chromatic middle section that
hints at Rachmaninov, the theme resurfaces, but this time in
octaves, bring-ing with it increased intensity. After a moment
of stillness, the coda makes for a bittersweet moment, when the
arpeggios that began the piece are recalled one last time.
The last piece in the set of etudes is “Fascinating Rhythm.” A
chromatic introduction sets the scene for the iconic theme.
Gershwin’s older brother, Ira, is said to have commented, “For
God’s sake, George, what kind of lyric do you write to a rhythm
like that?” It is amusing to contem-plate what Ira would have
said in response to Earl Wild’s virtuosic rewriting of the
piece. The first complete statement of the theme can be heard in
the right hand while the left hand plays a ragtime-style
accompaniment. The thematic material returns under different
guises, with each variation focusing on different rhythmic
transformations. For example, in one rendition of the theme, the
left hand plays an ostinato made up of a group of three eighth
notes against the mel-ody’s quadruple-meter drive. This metric
displacement gives rise to a polyrhythmic feel that would indeed
qualify as a fascinating rhythm! As the piece reaches its
conclusion, the theme is stated one last time, only to be
interrupted by a staccato sequence reaching the highest register
of the piano. From then on, the music spirals downward, an
inversion of the ascending introduc-tion. This sequence
eventually reaches the lowest note of the piece, B-flat,
concluding the etude with a satisfying major-ninth chord.
Franz Schubert: Piano Sonata in A Major, D. 959 I. Allegro
II. Andantino
III. Scherzo: Allegro vivace - Trio: Un poco più lento
IV. Rondo: Allegretto
“Franz Schubert, in his late piano sonatas, is revealed more
as a listener than a speaker, the ‘heavenly length’ being that
open-ended time it takes for a person to respond to the
suffering of another. The composer and performer thus enter into
an intimate communion of hearts, and the audience can only ever
be eavesdroppers.” —Stephen Hough
Schubert’s last three piano sonatas (D. 958, D. 959, D. 960),
String Quintet in C major, and Schwanengesang song cycle
were among the last works he finished before his passing in 1828
at the tragically young age of 31—only one year after
Beethoven’s death. While all three sonatas are cyclically
constructed, the A-major Sonata is most evidently so.
The arresting opening of the A-major sonata’s first movement
exudes both grandeur and optimism. The energetic leaps in the
bass that begin the work serve as an important rhythmic motive
throughout the rest of the piece. Interestingly, most of these
cyclic connections were added in later, after Schubert already
had a working draft of the sonata. Musicologist Maurice Brown
argues that, based on the sketches, there is substantial
evidence that Schubert wrote the last movement first, then the
first one. The second theme of the sonata unfolds into a gentle
and tender song—a lied. The development, which contains
some of the most magical and scintillating moments in the
movement, makes use of material from the second theme and
oscillates between the key areas of C and B major.
In contrast to the joy, life, and enthusiasm of the opening
movement, the second movement makes audible the terror, fear,
and sadness that Schubert must have been facing, writing this
sonata during the last months of his life. Beginning with a
lonely barcarolle, the movement soon whirls into its own
madness. Pianist Alfred Brendel and musicologist William
Kinderman both draw parallels to Goya’s painting 3rd of May,
1808, where an opposition between irrational brutality and
defenseless humanity is present. After the intensity of the
moment subsides, a short time of stasis gives an opportunity for
a low trill to emerge. The movement ends with a restatement of
the opening barcarolle, but this time with bells of fate.
If the second movement remains one of the darkest compositions
ever to have been written, the third movement almost flaunts its
giddiness, with the exception of one fleeting outbreak,
recalling the not-so-distant past. The middle trio section makes
use of the motivic leap from the very opening of the first
movement, but this time inverted.
Charles Rosen and Edward T. Cone have noted that the last
movement of the sonata is structurally modeled after Beethoven’s
Piano Sonata Op. 31, No. 1. The movement begins with Schubert in
his element as a song composer, the music filled with lyricism
and long flowing textures. András Schiff describes the
experience as Schubert taking music out of the room and into
nature—a symbol of the flowing of water and all that it carries.
Indeed, the composer’s appreciation of nature—a recurring theme
of the Romantics, who were seeking to restore man’s relationship
with the natural world—can be seen in many of his letters to
family. However,
behind the purity of this symbol, the horrors of the second
movement return, before the storm subsides reluctantly. The
closing section, with its hesitations and silences, is
astonishing, as if the singing stops mid-breath and is unable to
continue. The coda brings the work to a close with an
exhilarating rush to the end, and the motivic leap from the
opening of the sonata makes a triumphant return.
triumphant return.
In June, 1933,
after winning the Wanamaker Foundation Awards with her Symphony
in E minor (premiered by the Chicago Symphony), Florence Price
became the first black female composer to have her work
performed by a major orchestra. She graduated in 1906 with
honors from the New England Conservatory, where she majored in
piano and organ. She later became the head of the music
department in Clark Atlanta University, before finally settling
down in Chicago. She worked extensively with African-American
poet and writer, Langston Hughes, and was a teacher and a friend
of fellow female composer, Margaret Bonds.
The spirit of this arrangement is in line with Price’s original
poem for “Resignation”:
“My life is a pathway of sorrow;
I’ve struggled and toiled in the sun
with hope that the dawn of tomorrow
would break on a work that is done.
[…]
For ever the woe that it caused
I’m tired and want to go home.
My mother and sister are there;
They’re waiting for me to come
Where mansions are bright and fair.”
Allow me to build upon Price’s spirit with my own poem, which
also serves as a road map for this transcription.
In my journey, I have seen arrays of chaos;
My body has been washed,
By invisible scars.
My soul is stuck,
Underneath malicious rocks and crooked trees;
Anxious to get somewhere else;
aching to fly.
I see the clear skies; I feel the carefree winds;
I smell the earth, and I can almost touch the shining stars.
Give us a little more time and we will reach;
Serene.